It's a bit radical, but I know how he feels. Jeffrey Gedmin, head of the Berlin-based Aspen Institute, is so tired of anti-American bias in the media that he wouldn't mind seeing health warnings placed on articles. Medienkritik supplies the translation of his Die Welt article:

I think about this when I consider much of the one-sided reporting on Iraq. The United States is no exception. I came across an interview recently with Rod Nordland, the Baghdad bureau chief of Newsweek magazine. Asked why we should be optimistic about democracy in the Middle East, Nordland says, "Who's optimistic?" Asked why Bush cares about the people of Iraq, Nordland says, "Who says he cares?" Nordland has strong opinions. Me too. But Nordland is in the news business, so why not disclose in his by-line, "Mr. Nordland opposed the Iraq war, thinks Arab democracy is an illusion, and believes George W. Bush is heartless and cynical." At least there would be no pretending about neutrality and objectivity.

I think about this when I consider the one-sided reporting in Germany about the United States. Take the Berliner Tagesspiegel. The paper's correspondent writes for the news section and publishes columns on the opinion page. I often find it hard to tell the difference between the two. Sometimes the news stories are so opinionated I yearn for a label, like "Malte Lehming thinks that the president of the United States is a war-mongering ayatollah whose conservative-religious revolution is destroying American democracy."

|||Clive|||http://clivedavis.blogspot.com/2005/04/achtung-its-bit-radical-but-i-know-how.html|||4/08/2005 06:13:00 pm|||||||||