3/16/2005|||111093311021495934||||||
WMD REDUX

Like Melanie Phillips, Christopher Hitchens is perplexed by the NYT's account of high-tech looting after the fall of Baghdad:

What's all this about "looting"? The word is used throughout the long report, but here's what it's used to describe. "In four weeks from mid-April to mid-May of 2003 … teams with flatbed trucks and other heavy equipment moved systematically from site to site. … 'The first wave came for the machines,' Dr Araji said. 'The second wave, cables and cranes.' " Perhaps hedging the bet, the Times authors at this point refer to "organized looting."

But obviously, what we are reading about is a carefully planned military operation. The participants were not panicked or greedy civilians helping themselves—which is the customary definition of a "looter," especially in wartime. They were mechanized and mobile and under orders, and acting in a concerted fashion. Thus, if the story is factually correct—which we have no reason at all to doubt—then Saddam's Iraq was a fairly highly-evolved WMD state, with a contingency plan for further concealment and distribution of the weaponry in case of attack or discovery.

|||Clive|||http://clivedavis.blogspot.com/2005/03/wmd-redux-like-melanie-phillips.html|||3/16/2005 12:22:00 am|||||||||
|||